Former England captain John Terry has been found guilty by the English Football Association of racially abusing an opponent.
The Chelsea captain has been banned for four domestic matches and fined £220,000, pending appeal, after he was found guilty at an FA hearing of directing abuse at Queen's Park Rangers defender Anton Ferdinand during a Premier League match in October 2011.
The footballer denied the charge but the FA independent regulatory commission ruled that he was guilty of misconduct during Chelsea's defeat at QPR on October 23 last year.
The FA's guilty verdict came despite the 31-year-old being cleared by a criminal court in July of a racially aggravated public order offence.
The Chelsea defender's representatives, Elite Management, said Terry is "disappointed" by the guilty verdict, which was "a different conclusion to the clear not guilty verdict of a court of law".
He will ask for detailed written reasons of the decision before deciding whether to lodge an appeal, the management company added.
Before his FA hearing started this week, Terry announced his retirement from international football.
The case centred around an incident during a Chelsea QPR match last year when Terry and Ferdinand clashed verbally on a number of occasions.
Terry was found not guilty in Westminster Magistrates Court in July of a racially-aggravated public order offence with the prosecution unable to prove the words he said to Ferdinand were being used as an insult.
Terry admitted using the words, but insisted he had only been repeating words he thought Ferdinand had accused him of saying.
Chelsea and England team-mate Ashley Cole gave evidence that helped exonerate Terry, telling the court: "We shouldn't be sitting here".
The FA's decision to press ahead with their own charges infuriated Terry to the extent that on the eve of the disciplinary hearing he announced he was quitting international football with immediate effect, saying his position was "untenable".
Terry's legal team had argued the governing body's own rules dictated that his acquittal in court meant the case could not proceed but the FA believed their charge was distinct from the court charge.
No comments:
Post a Comment